Showing all posts tagged #wages:


US wages: going up

Posted on April 29th, 2016

Main takeaways:
  • ECI is Fed's preferred measure of wage growth.
  • So is is worth looking beyond the headlines...
  • ...and they suggest wage growth is firming.
  • Wages are growing at 2.5% pace, higher than the headline 2.1% would suggest, and...
  • ...the pace of wage growth in increasing -- as one would expect.

The employment cost index (ECI) measures the change in the cost of labor, free from the influence of employment shifts among occupations and industries -- and therefore is often Fed's preferred measure of labor costs. Total compensation costs for civilian workers is the measure that makes the headlines. It includes wages and salaries (around 70% of compensation costs) and benefits. Civilian workers includes private industry and state and local government establishments.

I will focus only on wages and salaries for private industries of the ECI report.

The chart below shows that wages and salaries for private industry workers rose 2.1% yoy in the first quarter of 2016, unchanged from the number reported in 4Q 2015. However, there is clearly a base effect (1Q 2015 seems to have been an outlier) and wages increased 2.6% annualized in the last three quarters (2.9% ar in 1Q 2016).


The ECI report breaks down wages by industry. The chart belows shows a surprising result: wages in the goods-producing industries (and manufacturing) -- a sector which is currently struggling -- is rising faster than wages in services and the growth rate is increasing.


But the above-mentioned discrepancy is also only due to base effect. When looking at the last two or three quarters, wage growth in both goods and services producing industries were close to 2.5% annualized.


One can also look at the detailed industry breakdown (looking into goods and services sectors). There is a lot of noise in the breakdown, but the black line in the chart below shows a simple average of annual wage growth for the main industries.


The chart below plots only the average for the main industries in order to highlight the recent trend.


Another way to understand the base effect is to look at wages by occupational group. We can see that sales & office spiked in the first quarter of 2015 and therefore the annual growth rate collapsed in 1Q 2016.


The chart below highlights the spike in wages for sales & office occupational group that happened in early 2015. There is an interesting paper explaining the volatility in the ECI indexes due to rates of pay that are defined wholly or in part on the results of worker efforts and the BLS reports an index of wages excluding incentive paid occupations. The chart also shows that the spike was related to performance incentives / bonus.


The chart below reproduces wages by occupational groups excluding incentive paid occupations (except for natural resources and construction). One gets a very different picture of wages by looking at this chart.


Now back to all wages. It shows that wages for private industry workers ex. incentive pay is growing at 2.5% yoy (vs. 2.1% when incentive pay is considered) and in the last two quarters wage growth has been 2.6% annualized (vs. 2.3% annualized when incentive pay is considered).


Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker: down to 3% in September

Posted on October 15th, 2015

The Atlanta Fed has developed a measure of wage growth using microdata from the CPS. For details see Wage Growth Tracker. Wages have slowed down in the last three months, from 3.2% in June to 3% in September. The male and female wages have diverged recently, but the overall trend since 2010 is clear: up!


The chart below shows that the (3mma) median increase in wages for individuals working in September 2014 and September 2015 was 3.0%, and compares with the most common measures of wage growth.



Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker: steady at 3.2% in July

Posted on September 10th, 2015

The Atlanta Fed has developed a measure of wage growth using microdata from the CPS. For details see Wage Growth Tracker.

The chart below shows that the (3mma) median increase in wages for individuals working in July 2014 and July 2015 was 3.2%, and compares with the most common measures of wage growth.



US - Employer costs for wages and salaries (2Q15)

Posted on September 9th, 2015

O BLS divulga uma pesquisa sobre os custos (wages, benefits) para o empregador, chamada ECEC (Employment Cost for Employee Compensation), que utiliza a mesma base da dados do ECI (Employment Cost Index) - a National Compensation Survey.

A principal diferença entre o ECI e o ECEC é que o ECI usa peso fixo para o emprego, de modo que o ECI mede a evolução dos salários sob a ótica do empregado (abstraindo das mudanças na composição do emprego), enquanto que o ECEC mede sob a ótica do custo para o empregador.

Os gráficos abaixo mostram que em ambas as métricas (ECI e ECEC) o primeiro trimestre pareceu excessivamente elevado e houve um arrefecimento no 2Q -- porém o ECEC sugere que houve de fato uma mudança no patamar de salários e total compensation.


Total compensation vs wages




Wages - incluindo o AHE da pesquisa do payroll





Paulo Gustavo Grahl, CFA

Random comments on macro data. Views are my own. Except when they aren't.