US Univ. of Michigan Sentiment: rich vs poor

Posted on December 11th, 2015

Main takeaways:
  • Preliminary Michigan Sentiment in December at 91.8, up 0.5 points from November.
  • Poor consumers are felling better about current situation.
  • Rich consumers are worried about the future.
  • All think unemployment rate has reached a bottom.
  • The overall tone of the report was very positive (see quotes below). Current level of Sentiment is associated with real consumption growing at 3.25%.
  • Historical episodes show that real consumption grows in the 2.25%-4.5% range while Sentiment is near current levels.
  • 5-10y inflation expectation at the 2.6% level.


Additional highlights in the report:
  • "December gain was recorded among households with incomes in the bottom two-thirds (+2.7pp)"
  • "Sentiment Index among consumers with incomes in the top third declined (-4.4pp)"
  • "Largest loss was in how consumers judged prospects for the national economy the year ahead"
  • "Consumers anticipated somewhat lower wage gains and were less optimistic about continued declines in the unemployment rate"
  • "Two-thirds of all consumers expect interest rates to increase in the year ahead, a reading only comparable to the levels last recorded from 2004 to 2006"
  • "During the past three months, the average expected long term inflation rate (2.6%) was the lowest recorded in more than a quarter century"
  • "Less favorable prospects for the national economy were more frequently voiced by households with incomes in the top third"
  • "Regardless of income, consumers expect unemployment to edge slightly upward in the year ahead"

Preliminary Michigan Sentiment in December at 91.8, up 0.5 points from the November estimate.


Looking closer at the relationship between Michigan Sentiment and household consumption:
The chart below plots the 3mma of Michigan Sentiment in the x-axis and real consumption (3mma, YoY) in the y-axis. The vertical black line shows the most recent monthly print. The expected growth rate of consumption based on the latest Sentiment reading would be close to 3.25%.

Perhaps even more important, the current level of Sentiment is compatible with consumption growth in the 2.25%-4.5% range, with a few outliers above this range and no episode of real consumption growth below 2% in the vicinity of the current level for Michigan Sentiment.


Inflation expectations at 2.6%.



US Retail Sales -- excluding gasoline, retail sales are growing at a healthy 4.4%

Posted on December 11th, 2015

Main takeaways:
  • November: advance retail sales rose 0.2%mom, below 0.3% market consensus; control group increased 0.6%mom above 0.4% consensus.
  • Trend growth remains unchanged:
    • 12-month growth of total retail sales ex gasoline stations increased from 4.3% to 4.4%.
    • 12-month growth of the 'control group' rose from 3.1% to 3.4%.
    • Both are very close to the 4-year growth pace: a resilient consumer!
    • Recall that retail prices are close to flat -- so the above growth rates are close to volume growth!
  • Inventory-to-sales ratio remained roughly flat (excluding gasoline).

The overall trend for retail sales remains unchanged. Excluding sales at gas stations the trend growth is healthy: 4.4% in the last year compared to 4.5% in the last 4 years (in nominal terms).

The chart below compares total retail sales with retail excluding gasoline sales. It is clear that most of the slowdown in retail sales in the last few months was due to falling gasoline prices (similar to what has happened earlier in the year).

Looking at the "control group" (total retail excluding auto dealers, bldg materials, gas stations) a similar growth picture emerges: 3.4% growth in the last year and 3.0% in the last 4 years.

Excluding residual sales of gasoline from the control group reveals a 1pp growth gap.

Also, it is important to recall that (control group) retail prices have been trending down in the last year...

...which results in a very healthy 3.6% growth rate in retail volumes.



Inventories: stable if one excludes gasoline sales (latest: October)




Extra charts

The charts below show retail and food services by kind of business. The red line is an index in log (averages zero in the period) so that a number 10 in the scale means sales are 10% higher than the period average. The red dashed line is the trend in the last 12 months and the blue bars (right scale) are the monthly percentage change. The headline is how the slope of the red dashed line has changed compared to last two months.


Last 12 months trend moved from 6.1% (Aug) to 6.7% to 6.4%


Last 12 months trend moved from 5.0% (Aug) to 5.5% to 5.8%


Last 12 months trend from -4.6% (Aug) to -3.8% to -1.8%


Last 12 months trend moved from 1.7% (Aug) to 3.4% to 3.0%


Last 12 months trend moved from 2.7% (Aug) to 1.9% to 1.8%


Last 12 months trend moved from 3.4% (Aug) to 4.0% to 3.8%


Last 12 months trend moved from -19.2% (Aug) to -14.2% to -11.6%


Last 12 months trend moved from 3.6% (Aug) to 2.6% to 1.8%



Last 12 months trend moved from 5.6% (Aug) to 6.0% to 7.0%


Last 12 months trend from 0.8% (Aug) to 2.0% to 2.9%


Last 12 months trend moved from 4.8% (Aug) to 3.9% to 2.9%


Last 12 months trend moved from 6.7% (Aug) to 6.7% to 7.2%


Last 12 months trend from 7.4% (Aug) to 5.6% to 5.9%

US wholesale inventories led growth to be revised down by about one tenth in Q3 and Q4

Posted on December 10th, 2015


Main takeaways:
  • Lower than anticipated wholesale inventories in October and downward revisions to the previous month led analysts to adjust GDP growth estimates slightly down in Q3 and Q4 by about one tenth. GDP growth tracking for Q4 is in the 1.5% to 2.0% range.
  • Wholesale sales are moving sideways (current prices) after a sharp drop earlier this year.
  • However, adjusting for prices, wholesale sales are now back to trend.
  • Inventory buildup is mostly due to petroleum.


The chart below shows that retail, wholesale and manufacturing sales, all slowed down materially since mid-2014.
Retail sales excluding gasoline is still growing at a reasonable pace (see US Retail Sales -- trend remains unchanged Oct/2015)
So, let's take a closer look at wholesale sales.


Part of the slowdown in wholesale sales is clearly due to price effect. Adjusting for falling prices, wholesale sales were roughly flat from late 2014 to mid 2015 and now appears to be back to the trend observed since 2009.

Another frequent concern is the inventory buildup at wholesalers. The chart below show that the inventory to sales ratio has increased sharply in the last three quarters.

But a similar price effect might be distorting oil inventories. Excluding autos, farm, and petroleum, the rise in the inventory-to-sales is less pronounced.


US External Trade: Net exports likely to be a drag again in Q4 (Oct/15)

Posted on December 4th, 2015

Main takeaways:
  • Net exports likely to be a drag on growth again.
  • US exports are not losing market share, despite dollar strengthening that started mid-2014.
  • Weak US exports more likely reflect sluggish global trade.


Trade results for October, if repeated in the next couple of months, would lead to a material drag in Q4 growth again. Note, however, that periods of consistent drag from net exports were also observed in the 1997-2005 period -- see chart.

Imports are growing at a strong pace and exports collapsed in the turn of the year and remained roughly flat since then.

The jump in import growth precedes the stronger USD and coincides with an upturns in job creation and consumption that happened in 2014 -- therefore not likely to be a strong consequence of the currency strength and import substitution (although it may play some role).
The slowdown in exports, however, happened at the turn of the year, and therefore could potentially be a quick response to the strenghtening of the dollar that started in mid-2014.

However, the chart below shows that US exports are moving roughly in tandem with world exports...yes US exports relative to world exports dropped since the start of 2015, but the relative level is only 1.5% below the trend since the crisis. This means that the recent strengthening of the dollar is not causing a loss of US market share in world (volume) exports.
Of course it could be just a matter of time for US exports to shrink relative to world exports, but the recent weak performance seems more likely a result of sluggish world trade rather than dollar strength.

Meanwhile, the ISM export orders do not suggest any upside in the near term.



US November employment by category

Posted on December 4th, 2015

November employment by category

The charts below show employment by category. The blue line is total employment in the category, the orange bar is monthly change and the red line is the linear regression in the last two years.

Total payroll increased 211k in November, after a 298k growth in October (which was revised up from 271k). The trend for the last 6 months slowed from 280k/month by the end of last year to 213k in the 6 months to November.

Private payroll increased 197k in November, after 304k growth in October (revised up from 268k). The trend for the last 6 months slowed from 270k/month by the end of last year to 201k in the 6 months to November.

Most of the slowdown in the pace of job creation was concentrated in the goods producing sector (mining and manufacturing); construction jobs are doing ok and the the services sector has, so far, not being affected by manufacturing slowdown. Overall, the 6-month pace of job creation in the goods sector slowed from 50k (at the end of last year) to close to zero, while in the services sector it slowed from 220k to 194k in the same comparison.

Employment categories

  • Total nonfarm
    • Total private
      • Goods-producing
        • Mining and logging
        • Construction
        • Manufacturing
      • Private service-providing
        • Trade, transportation, and utilities
          • Wholesale trade
          • Retail trade
          • Transportation and warehousing
          • Utilities
        • Information
        • Financial activities
        • Professional and business services
          • Temporary help services
        • Education and health services
          • Educational services
          • Health care and social assistance
        • Leisure and hospitality
        • Other services
    • Government

Charts

Total nonfarm (trend from 242.7 to 242.1 to 241.7/m)

Total private (trend from 235.6 to 235.0 to 234.5/m)

Goods-producing (trend from 34.8 to 32.4 to 30.4/m)

Mining and logging (trend from -1.1 to -1.5 to -2.0/m)

Construction (trend from 22.4 to 21.8 to 21.7/m)

Manufacturing (trend from 14.1 to 13.0 to 12.0/m)

Private service-providing (trend from 200.8 to 202.6 to 204.1/m)

Wholesale trade (trend from 7.9 to 7.8 to 7.5/m)

Retail trade (trend from 24.0 to 23.9 to 24.2/m)

Transportation and warehousing (trend from 12.4 to 12.1 to 11.4/m)

Utilities (trend from 0.7 to 0.7 to 0.8/m)

Information (trend from 3.9 to 3.8 to 3.9/m)

Financial activities (trend from 11.6 to 11.8 to 12.2/m)

Professional and business services (trend from 53.7 to 54.2 to 54.4/m)

Temporary help services (trend from 11.9 to 11.7 to 11.2/m)

Educational services (trend from 4.2 to 4.1 to 4.4/m)

Health care and social assistance (trend from 39.1 to 40.9 to 42.3/m)

Leisure and hospitality (trend from 37.1 to 37.1 to 37.3/m)

Other services (trend from 6.2 to 6.1 to 5.8/m)

Government (trend from 7.0 to 7.1 to 7.2/m)


Dr. Paulo Gustavo Grahl, CFA (2015-12-04)



US November Payroll: changing the focus to the pace of rate increases...

Posted on December 4th, 2015

Main takeaways:

  • Yellen's speech at the Economic Club of Washington on Dec 2 explained why she will vote for an increase in rates on December 16. There's nothing in today's job report that would make her change her mind.
  • A couple of months ago I took the view Aug/Sept plunge in job creation would reverse in time for a December liftoff: "Since I believe the payroll slowdown is temporary and that global risks are likely to recede in the coming months, I think December is still the most likely date for moving out of the ZLB". That's now a consensus.
  • The focus will now shift to the pace of increase thereafter, as the Fed wishes:
    • "what matters for economic outlook are the public's expectations concerning the path of the federal funds rate over time" (Yellen speech).
  • But FOMC expected, in September's projections, around 100bp increase / year in the next couple of years; market expects, on average, around 50-60bp per year. The FOMC could move a bit towards markets in the next meeting, but the gap will remain large.
  • The risk of a very short hiking cycle is not trivial; but, barring a China colapse, I think odds are both the Fed and the markets will adjust expectations upwards by mid H1 2016.

Establishment report:

Private payroll increased 197k in November, in line with the bloomberg consensus. Net revisions were positive 52k.

The table below shows the expected range for private payroll (excluding outliers), the monthly surprise and revisions to the last 3 months. The actual print is in "red" (an "x" when inside the expected range and a box when outside).

It is interesting to see the shape of the gray area! The negative surprises in August and September led to a material downward change in market's expected range for private payroll. A positive surprise in October resulted in an opposite move.


Market has been on track forecasting the pace of job creation in the last 6 months!
(but actual number beat forecast in the last 3 months)
One can see that the average of the median expectations for the last 12 months was 212k/month, very close to the actual releases of 213k/month in the same period (after revisions, private payroll averaged 212k/month in the last 12 months).

In the last 6 months the median expectations averaged 201k/months and the actual release averaged 193k (201k/month after revisions).

In the last 3 months the median expectations averaged 188k/m and the actual release averaged 194k/month (222k/month after revisions).

Payroll trend
The trend in private payroll (measured by the 12-month moving average) moved down to 212k/month from 226k/month (unrevised) in October. The chart below shows the current vintage (orange line) as well as the real time path observed in each of the last few months.

It is clear that the pace of job creation has slowed from the excessively high pace observed in Q4 2014 and Q1 2015, but it is still well above the job growth observed in 2013 / early 2014.


The chart below shows that annual growth rate in private payroll is growing at 2.1% yoy -- off the highs but is still a healthy pace of growth.


Job growth momentum is back to neutral after spending Q2 and Q3 in the negative area.

Labor input:

The volume of total hours worked in the economy recovered from September and is back on the trend since 2009. Total hours worked increased 2.2% (annualized) in the last 3 months (blue line in the chart below).


Hours worked in the goods sector have been roughly flat in 2015. Hours worked in the services sectors continued performing well.



Wages:

Wages for all employees rose by 2.3% yoy (vs 2.4% in October) and for production worker rose 2% yoy (vs 2.2% in October). Overall, as the chart below shows, average hourly earnings have consistently grown at about 2.1% p.a in the last three years.


Household income:

Good. Close to the trend observed in the last three years.


Goods sector nominal income below trend.

Services sector income close to trend.


Household report:

The labor force participation rate ticked up in November (to 62.5% -- see chart).
It is interesting to highlight that the most LFPR managed to do was to stabilize in 2014 -- a year in which job creation and labor market conditions improved quite substantially. If the LFPR resumes its structural downtrend it could put the Fed in a position where they see labor slack shrinking faster than what they forecast, despite a similar economic growth outlook.

The broader measure of unemployment (U-6), which includes marginally attached, discouraged workers, and employed part time for economic reasons move slightly up in November, but overall it is falling faster than the headline unemployment.

The median forecast for unemployment rate in the Fed's SEP (Summary of Economic Projections) is 4.8% for 2016, 2017 and 2018. Assuming a flat LFPR, a forecast of 4.8% unemployment rate by the end of 2016 is compatible with average employment growth of 145k/month, substantially lower than the current pace of job growth.


As a reference, even a slowdown in employment growth from 2.1% currently to 1.5% yoy (the floor observed since mid-2011 was 1.8% yoy) would be equivalent to monthly employment gains of 178k and this would lead to a 4.4% unemployment rate by the end of 2016. Bottom line: LFPR needs to rebound (or job creation to settle at a very low level) for a 4.8% unemployment forecast to be attainable.

See detailed charts below:




The chart below shows unemployment rate (and short-term unemployment) and the recent tightening cycles (yellow). The short-term unemployment rate is at the lows.

Long term unemployment rate is improving faster. Moreover, the 'shadow' labor (i.e., the gap between U-6 and the headline unemployment rate) is also improving faster in the recent months. This is a clear sign that the labor market continues improving.





















US Personal Income and Outlays in October: income growing fast; consumption slowdown due to energy

Posted on November 25th, 2015


Main takeaways:

  • Income and spending trends broadly unchanged when comparing to the previous report.
  • Slowdown in consumption in September/October is due to energy:
    • Consumption of energy goods and services dropped 8.9% (not annualized) since August.
    • Excluding energy, consumption rose 0.6% in the two months (3.8% annualized).
  • Consumption and income seem to have weathered well the spike in financial conditions.
  • Nominal (real) disposable income trend growth in the last 12 months growing at 4.2% (3.4%) and consumption trend growth at 3.7% (2.8%).
  • Core nominal (real) consumption (ex food and energy) growing at 4.5% (3.2%) in the last 12 months.


Personal consumption excluding energy keeps growing...
...in current prices...

...and volumes.

So the slowdown in the previous couple of months is entirely due to energy. This mirrors the conclusion I had when looking only at the narrower retail sales data (US Retail Sales -- trend remains unchanged.

Income and spending (ex energy) are growing at roughly the same pace. But the slower pace of growth in total consumption (including energy) means savings rate is increasing.


Disposable income seems to be in a steady trend, while household consumption rebounded from the lows early in the year and is back to its previous trend growth.

Chart 1a) Income and expenditures, nominal, since 2010


The growth trend in the last 12 months for disposable income rose to 4.2% in October (3.3% in September and 3.1% in June), while the growth trend for consumption moved up to 3.7% (from 3.6% in September and 2.6% in June).

Cart 1b) Income and expenditures, nominal, last 2 years


Chart 2a) Income and expenditures, volume, since 2010


When looking at volumes (constant prices) the trend growth in real disposable income rose to 3.4% in October (from 2.9% in September and 3.2% in July), while real consumption slowed to 2.8% (vs 3% in September and 2.8% in July).

Chart 2b) Income and expenditures, volume, last 2 years



The chart below shows slightly different measures of income. Overall, all measures are growing at or above 5% in the last 6 months!

Chart 3a) Different measures / concepts of household income, since 2010


Chart 3b) Different measures / concepts of household income, last 2 years



The chart below shows that almost all the recent stagnation in consumption was due to 'energy' consumption.

Chart 4a) Household consumption, core vs total, nominal, since 2010


Chart 4b) Household consumption, core vs total, nominal, last 2 years


Chart 4c) Household consumption, core vs total, volumes, since 2010



Chart 4d) Household consumption, core vs total, volumes, last 2 years


Breaking household consumption into goods and services show that the recent soft patch was entirely due to goods consumption -- but take a look in the chart of volumes: it shows goods consumption growing faster than services.

Chart 5a) Goods and services consumption, nominal, since 2010



Chart 5b) Goods and services consumption, volume, since 2010



Digging further into goods consumption it is evident that most of the hit happened in nondurable (which includes gasoline), but when adjusting for prices nondurable goods seem to be back to the previous growth trend.

Chart 6a) Goods consumption (durables and nondurables), nominal, since 2010



Chart 6b) Goods consumption (durables and nondurables), volume, since 2010



Chart below focus only on nondurable goods (volume) to better spot the trends.

Chart 6c) Goods consumption (nondurables), volume, since 2010










World trade volumes remain sluggish

Posted on November 25th, 2015

Main takeaways:

  • World trade volumes rebounded after the slowdown earlier in the year.
  • But volumes are flat compared to last year.

The Netherlands Bureau for Economic Analysis (CPB - Centraal Planbureau) has released world trade volume data for September.

The charts below shows world trade volumes picking up a bit since the first quarter contraction, but the overall message is still of a very sluggish trade.

Chart 1a) Volume of world trade (exports & imports, seasonally adjusted)


Chart 1b) Volume of world trade (seasonally adjusted)


The charts below zoom in to the most recent four years to highlight the behavior of trade volumes at margin. Export trend growth in the last two years slowed from 2.4% to 2.1% (from July to September), while import trend growth slowed from 1.8% to 1.6% in the same comparison.

Chart 2a) Volume of world exports (seasonally adjusted, last 4 years)


Chart 2b) Volume of world imports (seasonally adjusted, last 4 years)


The breakdown by country/region show that export volumes from the Euro Area have been very resilient while export volumes fell in the other regions. Imports have rebounded in most regions in recent months.

Chart 3a) Export volumes by country / region (seasonally adjusted)


Chart 4b) Import volumes by country (seasonally adjusted)



US Corporate Profits -- adjusting for FX valuation (updated with Q3 2015 results)

Posted on November 24th, 2015

Main takeaways:
  • Foreign profits represent 40% of domestic profits for US corporates.
  • Profits increased 1.4% p.a. since 2011.
  • Adjusting for currency valuation, profits increased 2.5% since 2011.
  • Profit growth in the last 4 quarters slowed in both measures: from 3.6% to 0.9% in headline profits and from 5.7% to 4.0% when adjusting for FX.

Foreign profits represent about 40% of domestic profits (for US corporates, based on national accounts data).

The chart below adjusts the portion of the foreign profits for the currency effect (assuming that the currency composition of foreign profits is equivalent to the currency composition of the trade-weighted dollar calculated by the US Fed).
The "adjusted profits" show a slightly higher trend growth since 2011 -- 2.5% vs 1.4%.

Chart below shows the YoY growth of corporate profits with and without FX adjustment.


A closer look at US corporate profits and cash flow (part 2) (updated with Q3 2015 results)

Posted on November 24th, 2015

Main takeaways:
  • Numbers below are for nonfinancial domestic corporate.
  • After tax profits are $953bn (+1.8% yoy).
  • Nonfinancial domestic corporate net cash flow has increased recently to $1.7tn (+2.4% yoy).
  • The profit measure more closely associated with S&P500 reported earnings ticked down in 3Q15, but is up by 5.6% since last year.


Charts below are for Nonfinancial Domestic Corporate sector -- the ones in "A closer look at US corporate profits and cash flow (updated with Q3 2015 results)" are for total US corporate sector.

Total nonfinancial domestic profits from current production currently at $1.3tn.

Below total nonfinancial domestic profits from current production after taxes.

Out of the $0.96tn $0.94tn in after tax profits, 60% 61.6% is dividends and 40% 38.4% ($390bn $358bn) is saved.

It is also possible to calculate cash flow -- which is undistributed profits puls depreciation less (net) transfers. It is a measure of internal funds available for investment.

The national accounts also provide a measure of profits after tax without IVA and CCAdj. This is the measure often used in comparisons with the S&P measures of reported earnings.





Paulo Gustavo Grahl, CFA

Random comments on macro data. Views are my own. Except when they aren't.